Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Clay Takaya who wrote (9647)	9/24/1999 1:20:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

>>I appreciate you setting the record straight, but it is interesting that you chose to post it in a rude, offensive manner. I guess you just can't help it. I can, but I often respond in kind, especially to blatant hypocrites: >>As usual (in addition to your whining way of putting things and twisting the facts to suite your conclusions).... I am worried that your tiresome, self-serving comments are going to discourage Mr. Fun from posting. I consider him the highlight of this board and maybe of the entire site. Message 11353447 Sorry to shatter first your delusions and now your hypocrisy.

To: Clay Takaya who wrote (9647)	9/24/1999 4:12:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21876

Perhaps it's due to the fact that any time anyone posts something that doesn't put LU in a good light on this thread they get pounded. What's most interesting is that usually the retorts are misled or are not direct responses to the discussion at hand. I wish I had never remarked about Russo's mistake in dealing with the press. The proper answer should have been "yeah big mistake but LU with our without a lead in patents is leading the optical market and CSCO still has a long way to go to even get a foothold". That would have been more accurate than someone coming in and telling me what I read is not what I read.. .then someone else telling me that LU is kicking a$$ in the optical market. The discussion was about Russo then it deteriorates into bickering...and even your illustrious Fun-man got involved with his hollier-than-thou rant. he completely missed the point of the discussion. Zoltan may be fed up as well.... I can't speak for him but saying anything less than positive over here is death. Yes, even LU makes mistakes as does CSCO. No company is perfect. I don't think Russo's comments in anyway are a negative or will effect this security negatively. I made an off-handed comment and eveyone starts to whine. NOW CAN WE GET BACK to the market. OG