SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Lloyd who wrote (30520)9/24/1999 4:15:00 PM
From: wily  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 93625
 
Damn! This sounds exactly like the Bilow/Walliker et al discussion. I guess we know who won.

Rambus: Never lacking drama!



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (30520)9/24/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: John Walliker  Respond to of 93625
 
Don,

There is at least one problem with that article:

The quickest way to solve the timing problem with three RIMM slots, sources said, is to shorten the memory bus line, now 10 cm long. Industry sources now believe Intel is doing exactly that. But if Intel cannot design a workaround as expected, than existing boards will have to be scrapped pending a redesign.

The signal path in EACH RIMM is at least 8cm long, based on the shortest possible route between the contacts. This means that the 3-slot memory bus is likely to be at least 28 cm long, perhaps a little more.

What else is wrong with that article?

John



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (30520)9/24/1999 5:58:00 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
I agree witht the last analysts comments in this article. Problems like these should have been flushed out months ago. This last minute shit is bullshit.