SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CheckFree Holdings Corp. (CKFR), the next Dell, Intel? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Howard C. who wrote (10545)9/24/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: David H. Zimmer  Respond to of 20297
 
Both the purchase of a call and the short of a put suggests that the person believes the stock is going higher. That is the only similarity.

The risk in buying a call is limited to the premium paid. The risk in shorting a put is the strike price of the put, less the premium paid. In other words, if I shorted a 35 put on CKFR and received $3 in premium, my maximum risk would be $32.

In addition, the feature that attracts me to options, time, is on different sides of the fence. When buying a call, time works against you. When selling a put, time works in your favor.

If you are inexperienced, make an assumption that you shorted a 35 October put for CKFR today at $1 3/4 (Had the order in all day and never got filled.) Watch what happens to this over the next few weeks and check back in.



To: Howard C. who wrote (10545)9/26/1999 7:20:00 AM
From: AnnaInVA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20297
 
Howard, another way of looking at this:

If you buy a call and the stock does not go above the strike price you purchased it for, the call expires useless and you lost your money.
If you write a naked put, for instance at a strike of 40, you will receive a certain amount of money for this put but you obligate yourself to purchase the stock at $40 if the stock stays below 40 at time of put expiration.