Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jaci Kidd who wrote (20584)	9/24/1999 11:45:00 PM
From: GC	Respond to of 34075

whats all this talk about 20 or 40 : 1 reverse split LOL they be nuts if they did that anytime soon , after if and when they did it the MM would walk the price down again to where we are to-day. been their saw it happen too many times over and over again. if they got the gold issue more stock,if not let this thing go too zero , quit jerking the chain , get this thing rolling back on the BB a reverse split will do nothing for this stock or the shareholders at this time or any time soon

To: Jaci Kidd who wrote (20584)	9/25/1999 1:36:00 AM
From: Ironyman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Jaci, You may or may not understand this, but a "Shy-er" shareholder than I has said " Pay the twenty and shoot the rest". The real truth is that the number twenty came from somewhere else and that it has nothing to do with a reverse split. The stock price is due to dilution which was expected and needed for " The Deal". Jaci...I thought of you while looking at Burnhardt and Century. Alas may budget was only Thomasville, yet the Hemmingway collection. Regards, Irony Man