SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : CLTR COULTER PHARMACEUTICAL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rkrw who wrote (321)9/26/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 666
 
<I asked the big bull V1 but he wimped out of answering. >

You won't get much response saying things like that.

DAK



To: rkrw who wrote (321)9/26/1999 4:07:00 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 666
 
I asked the big bull V1

Someplace around here, in one of the threads that are widely followed, V1 said that he had placed his professional reputation on his stance on CLTR.

I don't know which response that you're referring to, and I respect your opinion too much to question your reaction, but.... I assure you, there's a recent V1 post around here somewhere which is the most clear-cut expression of support for the company that I've seen.

Let's separate the men from the boys. Who's sticking to their guns and adding more?

I have elected to "pass" on CLTR. Don't know if that makes me a "boy" iyo, but.... it's been my stance for some time, so I'll presume that it's "sticking to guns". No response necessary or expected.

Bottom line for this issue as it relates to CLTR or any other given stock...... we're all veteran biotech investors, and we know the "wisdom" of a well-balanced basket. We're all going to be incorrect about certain issues, but the intent is to have some big winners in that basket.

Going one step further..... if I *had* to choose a stance at this market cap, I'd go with a long position. I have more insight into other companies, and my "pass" reflects concern balanced by ignorance.



To: rkrw who wrote (321)9/26/1999 4:55:00 PM
From: W PAUL  Respond to of 666
 
cf Biotech vs Shorts post 222 V1 to Peter Suzman.
Hit me between the eyes.
Don't be so fly with your own reputation please - you have one too.