Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : e-Vegas.com (EVCM) formerly ECGC -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francis R. Biscan Jr. who wrote (143)	9/26/1999 2:43:00 PM
From: SwampDogg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 207

"First, this will have no effect on shareholders, because it is a dispute with Presidents Group." It looks like it already has.....

To: Francis R. Biscan Jr. who wrote (143)	9/26/1999 2:46:00 PM
From: SwampDogg	Respond to of 207

"In my opinion, anyone that it short this company has made a serious mistake, except in the very short term." Well it looks like being long has been a serious mistake...

To: Francis R. Biscan Jr. who wrote (143)	9/26/1999 2:47:00 PM
From: SwampDogg	Respond to of 207

"The issue is whether we have a viable growing company in terms of revenues and earnings. Aside from the need for audited financials, I think it is clear we do" Is that a contradiction? How can it be "clear" if there is no audit?

To: Francis R. Biscan Jr. who wrote (143)	9/26/1999 2:50:00 PM
From: SwampDogg	Respond to of 207

"I believe it is a desperate attempt at covering a short position that he is finding very difficult to exit." I think he still was given a large chunk of the company. Why would he short it lower if he owns tons of stock? As a matter of fact, a lower stock price would lower the damages in the court case.