SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : e-Vegas.com (EVCM) formerly ECGC -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Francis R. Biscan Jr. who wrote (149)9/26/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: SwampDogg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 207
 
I used four different posts because I felt that each point that you made was silly enough on its own.
First of all, to say that revenue growth in a company is clear when their financials are not audited is absolutely stupid. You can talk all that you want but the proof is in the pudding and these NRs stating revenue growth are totally useless. What about company expenses? Were these "revenues" the amount wagered? What % was paid out? Did the company lose money on the wagers? etc. etc.
Every BB company has to become fully reporting or else the game is over. Every BB company is talking the talk but until they actually walk the walk the figures are not to be believed.
In what context has the stock price suffered? Are you serious? Look at a chart since the news came out about the case.
How do I know that he received stock? Did you read the release about the court case?
I think that with BB stocks, the short term is all that is worth talking about.



To: Francis R. Biscan Jr. who wrote (149)9/26/1999 4:56:00 PM
From: SwampDogg  Respond to of 207
 
Applies to -- EVCM

-
E-Vegas.com in seed share dispute with Dil Gujral
EVCM
Shares issued 0 close $0
Friday Sep 10 1999
Also Cachet Enterprises Corp (CED)
by Brent Mudry
In a new pickle for Cachet Enterprises president Dil Gujral, the notable Vancouver stock promoter has been cut out of an OTC Bulletin Board Internet gambling promotion, E-Vegas.com. In a statement of claim filed Aug. 27 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the Vancouver Stock Exchange graduation candidate claims fellow Vancouver stock promoters Ed Gallagher and Antal "Tony" Markus reneged on an initial deal for him to get one-third of E-Vegas.com's seed shares. The named defendants include Vancouver-based Mr. Gallagher and his President's Corporate Group, associate Erwin Liem, and Kelowna-based Mr. Markus. No statements of defence have yet been filed.
Mr. Gujral's Howe Street lawyer, Rose-Marie Basham, seeks 2.45 million to 4.7 million E-Vegas.com shares for her client. E-Vegas.com's shares have tripled since the suit was filed, rising from 19 U.S. cents to Friday's closing price of 62 U.S. cents. The value of Mr. Gujral's claimed block of shares has risen from a range of $465,000 (U.S.) to $893,000 (U.S.) when the suit was filed two weeks ago, to a range of $1.52-million (U.S.) to $2.91-million (U.S.) on Friday.
While E-Vegas.com is a bulletin-board promotion, its star players are familiar faces on Howe Street, the centre of dealings on the VSE. Mr. Gujral has played significant roles in numerous notable VSE promotions over the years, ranging from controversial Australian promoter Graham Ferguson Lacey's Shepherd Insurance Group and repeat securities violator Robert Reid's Dimples Diapers in the past to Cachet, Colossal Resources and Vantage Enterprises more recently. Mr. Gallagher co-founded Canada Payphone, a Union Securities promotion, and served recent stints with Mr. Liem in First Telecom, Rangestar Telecommunications and Global Cogenix Industrial, amongst other VSE listings. Mr. Markus has a lower Howe Street profile, serving as a director of Merlin Resources, named after the street he lives on in Kelowna.
The current suit traces E-Vegas.com's origins back to February, when Mr. Gallagher, acting on behalf of himself, Mr. Markus, Mr. Liem and then-unformed President's Group, allegedly asked Mr. Gujral to lend them enough money to pick up a Nevada shell company called E-Casino Gaming, for the purpose of establishing an on-line gambling site. Mr. Gujral claims he agreed to lend $30,000 (U.S.) in return for one-third of the issued seed shares, one board position and an option to purchase more shares. In this first deal, the other seed shareholders would be Mr. Markus and President's Group, each with a one-third stake of E-Casino's 15 million shares.
Mr. Gujral now complains that after loaning the $30,000 (U.S.), he received only 300,000 shares of the company, since renamed E-Vegas.com. The suit claims that in late April or early May, Mr. Markus, Mr. Gallagher and Mr. Liem told Mr. Gujral that the number of issued shares was actually 11.22 million, and he would take title for the agreed-on one-third stake. The one-third share stakes of Mr. Gujral, Mr. Markus and President's Group would all be held by a trustee and not released from trust except under written agreement by all parties.
Mr. Gujral claims he reluctantly consented to this second agreement with the pooling clause, but the defendants reneged on this second deal. The promoter claims his associates did not prepare a written agreement as promised and subsequently advised him that his stake would be cut from one-third to one-quarter of the 11.22 million shares, to allow an unnamed third party to enter the picture. On July 15, Mr. Gujral received a draft contract for this third agreement, in which he would receive 2.75 million shares and all the seed shares would be held by Fiduciary Trust in the secretive offshore haven of the Cayman Islands.
The suit claims that Mr. Gujral reluctantly agreed to this third agreement, but his associates cut him back a week later, on July 21. In this revised deal, the trustee company would be Fidesco Trust of St. Kitts, another offshore haven, and Mr. Gujral would receive just 1.2 million shares. The balance of the 11 million shares would be divided between Mr. Markus, with 1.62 million shares, and five other named persons, entities or companies, with the identities undisclosed in the suit.
Mr. Gujral claims he refused to accept this latest version of the deal, and he now seeks to enforce one of the previous three versions. The suit seeks either 4.7 million, 3.44 million or 2.45 million shares for Mr. Gujral, depending on which of the first three agreements can be enforced.

(c) Copyright 1999 Canjex Publishing Ltd. canada-stockwatch.com




To: Francis R. Biscan Jr. who wrote (149)9/26/1999 6:06:00 PM
From: SwampDogg  Respond to of 207
 
BTW...how can you say that this company is on the up and up when they just received the Big "e"?
I think that the ball is in management's court to file the appropriate documents and become a fully reporting company. AT that time..things will be "clear".



To: Francis R. Biscan Jr. who wrote (149)9/26/1999 10:26:00 PM
From: michael john stout  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 207
 
Wow, if they really deliver the 25 cents per share in telecom earnings next year plus gaming, should be a 10 dollar stock. But those are big ifs.