Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ausdauer who wrote (7116)	9/27/1999 8:57:00 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 60323

Aus, I'm not going to ask how you found that site, but it certainly answers our questions. SNDK ought to be a fantastic buy this morning. As for the LEXAR suit, there are several aspects that investors might be interested in: An injunction often requires the posting of bond by the plaintiff. We'll see if SNDK demands that bond be posted. An injunction also indicates that there are triable issues of fact, which means the judge is signifying the issue can go to trial. Additionally, as one member pointed out in a previous comment, in order for LEXAR to prevail at trial, they have to prove damages in the form of lost business. And this proof needs to show specific damages - not just big round numbers, but real specifics like the number of orders that were shifted from LEXAR to SNDK because of SNDK claims. That's a pretty big job, but even if LEXAR can prove it, they also have to prove all along why they shouldn't be paying royalties to SNDK. Art