Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Millstream Mines (MLSM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just G who wrote (283)	9/28/1999 11:51:00 AM
From: MINEFINDER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 664

Thanks, that goes a considerable distance in explaining things, now they have to really bear down and develop said property!

To: Just G who wrote (283)	9/29/1999 1:27:00 AM
From: Brumell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 664

Had a chance to more thoroughly read MLSM's latest NR. It's interesting. This is the first time I've ever heard MLSM or any of their consultants refer to a vent. << A volcanic vent (feeder) has been discovered lying between the MASU mineralized mine area and this Blue Sky target. >> Some time ago I mentioned MLSM's web site carried a lot of information. It takes time to read but it's all there and not hype. It's rather cut and dried reports from geological consultants - what they found, their thoughts and opinions. While possibilities and future potential are theorized, I don't think a vent is specifically mentioned. If we accept this NR at face value, the vent could be very significant. Presumably it would appear as a north-south structure which originally fed and produced the east-west lying massive sulphide deposits. It could be the heart of a highly enriched zone. The question is, what information has been used to declare such a discovery? Is it based solely on geophysics? Are there drill indications (as were rumoured) of such a vent? It's all very mysterious. It may be significant or it may just be another lever to pump the market. Either way, suspect we'll be hearing a lot more about it in the near future. Regards. Bob

To: Just G who wrote (283)	9/29/1999 9:33:00 AM
From: hugh thorne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 664

I am only a bean counter, but if their argument has been over whether to focus drilling at the vent area between MASU and the Blue sky,or go off in some other direction,i #4$7king well vote for HDG's position. As they say, if they can substantiate the Quantec I.P. work then they kill 2 birds. Firstly the immediate shore up and secondly the ability to infer from their other conclusions. I wonder how long it will take to drill and produce results. The revised offering memorandum may well refer to a new buy in price based on current trading; it would be useful to know this. Secondly, are the financing terms set or do HDG have to wait, in which case HDG would presumably like to see a low price for the time being, get the paper work done and then sell the financing into a market where the trading price already exceeds the financing buy in. This has been the pattern of the past.