Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (60965)	9/28/1999 4:40:00 PM
From: Curlton Latts	Respond to of 67261

Rapist King Lost His Marbles nypostonline.com

To: DMaA who wrote (60965)	9/28/1999 4:45:00 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 67261

Your definition makes sense to me. It contains a basic premise with which to guide direction on any given issue. Thank you.

To: DMaA who wrote (60965)	9/28/1999 4:50:00 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 67261

Some social conservatives are "big government", some are not.....

To: DMaA who wrote (60965)	9/28/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

>I differ from that group in that I want to eliminate those levers.< I think this is fine, and I think most SCs would agree to a point. The problem enters on issues like homosexual rights and abortion. How would you eliminate levers there, particularly on abortion? If abortion is fundamentally murder, you got a problem. I honestly would allow folks to kill their own kids even months after birth if they would do it on their own dime. But not everyone is as liberal as I (Mercy I can be so brutally self-deprecating, or rather self-defecating.) I can understand how other SCs will disagree.