Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (41467)	9/29/1999 7:37:00 AM
From: Robert J Mullenbach	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116762

GOLD 320.00 323.00 +12.10 +3.93% the way it look now, somebody is going to be sorry they sold. have a nice day. I will. happy trading

To: long-gone who wrote (41467)	9/29/1999 10:33:00 AM
From: Jose Kranz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116762

HI RICHARD, Is there any reason why the central banks (all of a sudden )decided to hold off sales of GOLD? OK, 400 tonnes annually for the next five years.Why the sudden change? Is this the real reason for the GOLD spike? Thanks

To: long-gone who wrote (41467)	9/29/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116762

> some can trade themselves. sick, silly, & or poor. I have traded in and out of Barrick several times in the 17-to-20 range, and even picked up a covered call premium, with every trade profitable, putting me up about 50% year-to-date. Now don't shoot me, because I already feel "sick and silly" but not "poor" but when ABX hit $20 last week, I sold half of it. I'm sure you can imagine my joy this week, going through the "only if" scenario. I may feel a little dumb, but if I had done a "buy and hold" with ABX I would only be up 17.6% year to date.