SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (73425)9/29/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573682
 



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (73425)9/29/1999 10:49:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573682
 
Cirruslvr - <But without i820 it will be underperforming.>

Have you seen benchmarks with PC-133 or i810 with Cumine?

But yes, I believe i820 would be optimum. How much of an impact to performance due to the lack of i820 is unknown at this point (at least to me and presumably you).

It is still unknown to me how long i820 is going to be out of action. For all I know it could be fixed in time for the Cumine launch, or not.

PB




To: Cirruslvr who wrote (73425)9/29/1999 1:47:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573682
 
<But without i820 it will be underperforming.>

Gee, I thought the anti-Rambus coalition was claiming that Coppermine will underperform with the 820 chipset.

Or maybe you're thinking of some 820 chipset derivative with native PC133 support. As we all know, Intel's PC133 chipset (whatever it'll be called) won't come until 2000.

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News