To: jbe who wrote (56428 ) 9/29/1999 5:17:00 PM From: Michael M Respond to of 108807
Joan, agree with you that Bush was not a scholar in the area of international affairs (perhaps "W" learned everything he knows at his dad's knee!). I believe he understood the importance of foreign relations, I believe he understood America's role in the world (at the time), I believe he had competent counsel and listened to it and, as noted earlier, I believe he acted honorably and brilliantly as a foreign affairs leader in the Gulf War. Frankly, I think I prefer a competent man (with the best of advisors) as president vs. a scholar. I fear the scholar may be less well equipped to act and accept compromise -- not to mention a possible reluctance to take advice from other experts with differing views. Finally, in spite of all the jokes we make, I would give eight years as Veep some weight on the resume. I don't think Bush was bogged down by OJT after his election. None of this meant to disparage Bradley or your view of his qualifications. I will probably support the Republican unless Buchanan or Powell get the nod, but, IMO, Bradley makes Gore look like a lightweight. ***** Yeltsin always been a bit hard to figure for me. Does he really benefit from support of the west or does the west support him because he has the control? I remember well, the crisis in Oct '93. As luck would have it, I was in a smallish Eastern European city watching the live CNN coverage. You could almost hear a pin drop until the episode wound down. You could almost feel the nominally "former communist" security forces mulling over the possibilities. Not the most comfortable atmosphere. May have felt different elsewhere. I have no idea what will happen in Chechnya, but suspect it won't be very good for the natives. Later - Mike