SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Deswell Industries (DSWL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Barron who wrote (1325)9/30/1999 11:08:00 AM
From: Ron Bower  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1418
 
Richard,

Glad to see you are still on board.

In this market, Deswell looks very good.

Factors I'm watching-
Strength of the yen - IMO below 120 gives Deswell a big advantage.
Namtai should report earlier than Deswell. Strong earnings from them would (IMO) be an indicator for Deswell

Two things I'll be watching for in the Q report-
Earnings near last year's Sep Q would be very positive. I doubt if they can make last year's numbers this Q, but am looking for big improvement in the Dec Q. If they reach last year's numbers, $2.00 for the year is not only possible but likely.
They mentioned a "major new customer" in the last report. I hope to see a new name on the customer list.

If I figured right, Jetcrown can reach $12M revs on former capacity. The machinery they added this past year would substantially increase potential. It looks like Kwanasia and Kwanta will continue to be weak, but I doubt if they will be a drag on earnings. If Deswell reports around $15M revs and earnings near $3M this Q, look for big time gains in the Dec Q with Jetcrown's new equipment in production.

If the situation is as I think it is, we'll probably see another 10% dividend increase this year.

A good time to buy? The companies net worth (not BV) is more than the current price, they'll generate over $2.00/share operating cash, the dividend is likely to be near $1.00, and all indicators are for growth going forward.

But then, this is a very biased opinion.
Ron
My usual brief response -g-