SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (56497)9/30/1999 11:49:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Okay, I think it is more complicated, but I don't feel like fighting right at the moment. Let me just ask: does it give you no pause that Reagan is the only one in the world, practically, who thought that the Soviet Empire might expire in our lifetime, and it did? Or that everyone was predicting that Reaganomics would lead to misery in the '90s, and in fact we have had a boom? Ah, well....



To: E who wrote (56497)9/30/1999 12:00:00 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 108807
 
Let's not call it derangement- let's call it a really strange belief system. Lots of people in this country suspend their disbelief all the time- they believe in con men, they believe in TV evangelists- Reagan just happened (imo) to be more egocentric than most people and managed to suspend all disbelief about Himself. That can work for people. People who THINK they are Gods can sometimes do amazing things- but there's about a 50/50 chance those things will be destructive or constructive. Look at Napolean, and Hitler and many many other leaders who managed to believe in the myth of themselves. Lots of countries have had leaders that suffer from this "derangement" and I don't like it, but it makes them appealing to the masses who also long to be "deranged."



To: E who wrote (56497)9/30/1999 3:03:00 PM
From: Michael M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Invitation to E, X, and all other one-letter posters (oh, OK, anyone) --

Would you care to name the U.S. presidents since you have been of voting age who were better leaders or benefited the U.S and the world more than RR. Feel free to offer a brief explanation.

Mike