SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : AOW, Arrowhead Mineral Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ISPYOIL who wrote (156)9/30/1999 4:53:00 PM
From: Little Joe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 193
 
<<Denial of Permanent Injuction while a win for the AOW BODs, does not mean the issue is legally closed, stay tuned, this was a tactical victory but the various legal issues are still alive imho.>>

You may or may not be right. Depending on the law of the state where the suit was brought, any further claims coudld be barred under the doctrines of "res judicata" or collateral Estoppel. if the injunction was denied on procedural grounds, the plaintiff may still be alive, but if on substantive grounds it looks like the only avenue available to the plaintiffs would be an appeal. Caveat - I have not seen the actual court documents so what I am writing is based on the reports I have seen posted on this thread for the most part.

Live long and prosper,

Little joe



To: ISPYOIL who wrote (156)9/30/1999 5:10:00 PM
From: Bob Walsh  Respond to of 193
 
It was not merely a tactical victory. According to the news release, the court found that there was NO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE PARTIES. If there was no contract then there is NO cause of action (unless it is against Laird). There may also be a cause of action against a few posters.

Sleep well.

bob


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News