SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The New Iomega '2000' Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gottfried who wrote (2988)9/30/1999 4:12:00 PM
From: s. bateh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5023
 
Good news has just started!!!!imho



To: Gottfried who wrote (2988)10/1/1999 6:25:00 AM
From: Ben Antanaitis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5023
 
Gottfried,

From this morning's theStreet.com:

Undressing Window Dressing
By Aaron L. Task
Senior Writer
9/30/99 10:12 PM ET

Inside the Underbelly

SAN FRANCISCO -- Lots o' talk about "window dressing" being a factor in today's advance. The folks on CNBC were tossing the term around ad nauseam but the network didn't address how (why) groups that have sucked wind this quarter rallied, if window dressing really is the practice of fund managers buying stocks that have been big winners.

Financials and pharmaceuticals were glaring examples of this curious turn. The Philadelphia Stock Exchange/KBW Bank Index rose 2.7% today but lost 16% for the quarter. Similarly, the American Stock Exchange Pharmaceutical Index gained 1.7% today, but lost 8.3% for the third stanza.

But "buying the winners" is only half the story, according to one market veteran who requested anonymity.

"The other part is the seamier side" of window dressing, he said, pulling back the curtain (couldn't resist) to reveal an unsavory element of Wall Street. "Investors that own a big position in stocks that may have been losers call [their] broker and say 'I can't report this stock at 30. Buy 50,000 shares of XYZ and run the price to 32 or 35.'"

The source wasn't aware of any specific instances but said tomorrow and Monday will show which names hold today's gains and which revert to quarterly form.


That's what I meant.

Ben A.