SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ron C who wrote (7203)10/1/1999 8:47:00 AM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 60323
 
And then they announce the Coolpix will be available in Nov.

Ron, what Coolpix is coming in Nov.?

Jay



To: Ron C who wrote (7203)10/1/1999 9:20:00 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
As far as I can tell, the CoolPix 700 differs from the 950 mainly in not having an optical zoom lens (but it still allows digital zoom). The resolution and detail in color prints is quite a complicated issue. Now that I'm getting some experience, I can see how the proper use of software such as Adobe Photoshop (the most difficult and complex software ever written for personal computers) can make a great difference in results. The highest resolution setting for these 2+ megapixel cameras will ordinarily be impractical for everyday use, except where you are enlarging a portion of the original and don't want to lose detail. My point is that the camera itself is only one part of the equation. The print software (or software for preparation of images to be displayed on the computer screen) is just as important, as is the ability of the photographer to handle the software. I've already purchased two books on Photoshop.