Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mighty Mizzou who wrote (9748)	10/1/1999 3:22:00 PM
From: Kent Rattey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

Mighty, I figured you were still here. Lu is now a customer of mine. One of my friends started a few weeks ago at the LU/ASND/CSCC group. I purchased the stock after a long sabbatical. Looking forward to the earnings.... Got the Chefs defense in fantasy football! Kent

To: Mighty Mizzou who wrote (9748)	10/1/1999 6:19:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Respond to of 21876

Mizzou, That is not the issue. The issue is that you can't let go of the past whereas I already have. If you'd like to continue your legacy here on the LU thread that is your business. However, my comments were no different that the 10 or so that came before me yet it was my post you responded to ... and in most derrogatory fashion. The fact is that LU is now well over 20% off it's highs which is significantly more than others in this sector. That is not volatility - that is selling. I for one don't understand why LU should be so much further off while CSCO and NT are holding thier ground very well. I think if you base the LU price relative to CSCO and NT the selling here is overdone... or perhaps the selling on CSCO an NT are underdone. That all being said I know that October is a soft month. You know that I've been saying that since August so get off your soap box Mizzou. I can see that talking to you is a waste of time. It was my mistake for thinking that we could let the past be the past. OG