To: Paul Senior who wrote (8472 ) 10/2/1999 12:18:00 PM From: Daniel Chisholm Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78592
Re: death industry, The one thing I'd suggest to anyone considering an investment in this industry is to keep an eye on the debt. Since this is a stable and predictable sort of industry, a sound argument can be made for using a certain amount of debt. But since this industry has recently been through a consolidation phase, it is my contention that many in the industry may have overdone it w.r.t. the acquisition prices paid. To the extent that debt was involved in these acquisitions (and it was!), there exists the very real possibility that as animal passions cool and more sensible values prevail, there may be *NOTHING* left for common equity. (If the amount of real economic value they acquired with each of their overpaid-for acquisitions was less than the amount of debt used to finance the acquisitions, then in hindsight we can look at each of these overpaid-for acquisitions and say that they were a net *minus* to shareholder equity!) There may very well be good values to be had in buying up beaten-down common stock, just be aware that you must consider the possibility that some of the equity out there may be worthless in the long run. In spite of the stocks being at their lowest point in several years, do not ignore the fact that if the common is worthless (you must determine if this is true or not), then any price is too much! Alternately, you can look at the bonds that these companies have issued -- you might find that they are cheap enough to offer a value investor an equity-like return, if he has a superior idea of the stability and backing of value that the bonds have. In the very little that I have seen of the junk bond market, the market does in many cases over- and under- react to the good and bad prospects that happen to companies. It seems that there is just as much opportunity to find undervalued junk bonds as there is to find undervalued stocks. (FWIW I shorted Loewen common stock at $C3 and bought Loewen bonds at 50 cents based on what I have written above. My analysis was that the equity was worthless and the bonds were definitely worth 70-75 cents. I've been too lazy to see if similar ideas might work for others in the death industry). What really appealed to me in analyzing Loewen bonds was that it was really the first time I felt like I was in fact doing "real" Graham-type value analysis. The very factors that the hypesters of a few years back were using to hype the common stock during the go-go days of aggressive acquisitions and stock and debt financed rollups (stable steady growth, etc) worked very much in favor of establishing a tangible value and margin of safety for the bonds, once a reasonable price was established. I guess what I am saying here is that in spite of horribly huge overpayments for funeral homes having happened in the very recent past, these homes do in fact have a very real and stable value to them -- if we are now presented with the opportunity of buying these good sound stable businesses *AT THE RIGHT PRICE*, we can actually make a sensible investment in them. Analyze the business, the balance sheet and the stock market valuation. If you like what you see, be sure to take one last glance at the capital structure before you buy the common stock(!). Just because the company is down and will recover and prosper in the future does not mean that today's shareholders will still be around! - Daniel