Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M who wrote (4093)	10/2/1999 12:48:00 PM
From: Hank	Respond to of 10293

Just to keep the record straight (because I know you'll twist the truth if given the chance), I made two calls on VPHM. Message 10504542 The first time was in 1998 when VPHM was in the 20's. The stock went to $5 and change. The second time was after the press release on pleconaril shot the stock back up over 20 again. I recommended shorting over 20. The stock fell back to $12 and change before beginning another rally. Just for the record.

To: Mike M who wrote (4093)	10/2/1999 12:50:00 PM
From: Hank	Respond to of 10293

A reference to the original call in 1998: Message 10496082 Just for the record.

To: Mike M who wrote (4093)	10/2/1999 3:29:00 PM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

MikeyMouse your wrote; You aren't very smart either mad.....Really foolish comment considering I came to this thread before Dan and Howard Where did I say you were not here before Dan or Howard, or for that matter what difference does that make? To refresh your memory here's my post; To: Hank (4090 ) From: Mad2 Saturday, Oct 2 1999 1:22AM ET Reply # of 4102 Hank, Mike is a small minded kinda guy......takes his orders from Dan. He's doing guard duty over here as part of the GUMM BS'er squad and can't think of anything constructive to say. All he knows is throwin stones, being a pest and following Dan and howard around like a lap dog and gloat over their words. Lets see, there's a word for that........lemming. Mad2 Mikey your style is to deduct the illogical from a situation that suits your purpose, as you have done here.....that's where I infer your small mindedness. You probably don't even realize the fault of your logic as small minded people (such as yourself) have difficulity grasping the obvious. As it pertains to your being a lapdog and lemming I base that upon the fact that your opinions aren't accompanied by fact or orignality....you are a lapdog to Dan and his views. The fact that you have demonstrated yourself to be a worthless pest (without usefull ideas or views) on this thread before Dan arrived changes nothing. While I disagree whole heartedly with Dan on GUMM he does present orignal thoughts and information from which he supports his position. You on the otherhand do not. You twist, misrepresent and namecall with nary a orignal investment fact or idea that could be used by those who read this thread. Mike your the epitome of a lemming. Mad2