SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike M who wrote (4101)10/2/1999 5:49:00 PM
From: Hank  Respond to of 10293
 
"Don't worry Hank...I read all your messages...."

Why Mikey! I didn't know you were such a big fan! Why would someone as "noble" as you bother reading messages written by somebody that has "nothing to say"?

"I will be happy to give Wexler credit when he makes a decent call"

Apparently, you weren't around for the ZONA debacle, amongst others.

As for AN, no I won't take credit for that. Sure, it will drop on Monday and maybe even Tuesday. It's a simple reflex reaction to the gap up that was seen on Thursday. After that, it will continue to rally.

"You are looking at the only stock I feel obliged to share with you Hank"

Could that be because you have NO other suggestions worthy of printing here? At least I have the conviction to mention stocks I have an opinion on. YOU, on the other, stick only to GUMM, just as a good shill's supposed to. I can't decided if that's because you're paid to do so or because you're obsession with GUMM has reached maniacal proportions.

Surely, the great Mikey Mouse and his Mouseketeers can come up with at least ONE other stock of interest to discuss?



To: Mike M who wrote (4101)10/2/1999 6:30:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10293
 
Intelligence and owning GUMM is an oxymoron: "He is now in negative territory with GUMM and will continue to be in the months to come."

Perhaps not, and I do not think it will take month[s]. We shall see soon enough, won't we?