SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Kearney who wrote (79462)10/4/1999 2:31:00 AM
From: Eric Wells  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>>I've been holding MSFT since Jan 95, and
>>nobody ever thought it was a sure thing,

Tom - I think the key here is volatility. I held Microsoft from '91 up to this year. Never in that time did I see the price of MSFT get cut in half - nor did I recall ever having seen it get cut by a third. Yet we saw YHOO, AOL and AMZN all get cut in half at one point this year - and none of them have fully recovered. I invested in AOL at 160 with the intent to hold it long term. When it dropped by 25% within a few weeks of my having bought it, I realized that it was too volatile to be considered a good candidate for long term hold - at least at these price levels. I sold, and am very glad I did. I had a similar experience with YHOO.

You make the classic argument that internet bulls thrive on - that i-net companies have not yet proven themselves and that high profitability lies in the future. How long will you be making this argument? When does the future get here - and profitability become important?

The problem is that the popular analysts don't stress the extreme risks of these stocks - instead they focus on their price targets. Such statements fool buy-and-hold investors into thinking that i-net stocks are buy-and-hold candidates. They aren't. Their vehicles for traders. Ganesh makes the comment that he would never trust a sell-side analyst. Most investors don't make the distinction - they assume the i-bank analysts are stating truths - when they are not.

I've made a lot more money this year shorting internet stocks than holding long positions.

Thanks,
-Eric



To: Tom Kearney who wrote (79462)10/8/1999 11:22:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 164684
 
tk, i would expect long term investors to be doing well at the peak of a bubble and doing poorly at the bottom of a bear.