Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (73783)	10/4/1999 12:58:00 AM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572472

PB, <Hope so! This week should be fun.> Well the fun has already begun. Sharky has finally turned a corner! "we now heartily recommend the Athlon 700 CPU, and the systems based around it" www1.sharkyextreme.com A good review and that sheds some light into what Intel might be focussing on for CuMine w.r.t. benchmarks and when CuMine socketed versions might show up, etc. Chuck

To: Process Boy who wrote (73783)	10/4/1999 1:01:00 AM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572472

And, here is another.... 63.210.10.50

To: Process Boy who wrote (73783)	10/4/1999 1:01:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572472

Athlon 700 Review 63.210.10.50 (Anand) Here are a few quotes "The Coppermine should have some very unique offers to make that will give the Athlon some healthy competition." "It'll be interesting to see how well the Coppermine stands up in this test, but if the architecture stays the same it is highly unlikely that even a 700MHz Coppermine will blow the Athlon out of the water here." "Even under NT, the overall performance of the Athlon is still greater than that of Intel's fastest. It'll take quite a bit to match the power of the Athlon 700." This page - 63.210.10.50 speaks of Athlon 750 this year a few more words about "E".