Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (1046)	10/4/1999 11:09:00 PM
From: bob_the_ignoramus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

t's not enough to just trot the same old explanations with a new jingle. My point exactly. Also if an explanation is sufficiently poor (hehe) then maybe it should be abandoned all together rather than modified. just a thought. Looking back into history many theories (e.g. Newtons Corpuscles), that were adapted so much in order to explain new phenomenon that did not fit into the current theory, were actually wrong, and did not need adaptation, but should be rejected. IMO evolution is in this category.