Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (24055)	10/5/1999 5:42:00 PM
From: tonto	Respond to of 26163

Pugs makes less sense than usual and continues to post false statements. When did Charlie leave the company? <s> Pay attention to the Q's issued since his departure... The "control person" is a new term. Why does he think Charlie was this person? <s> By: Pugs Reply To: 6608 by JaniceShell Monday, 4 Oct 1999 at 3:05 PM EDT Post # of 6621 "......Far as AZNT's concerned: apart from the auditor's statement, in which he more or less said they were unable actually to perform an audit because the company's books didn't supply the necessary information,...." Shell, you're worst than a piece of sht becAUSE WE CAN AT LEAST FLUSH A TURD AWAY, YOUR STINK NEVER CEASES. your buddy (employer?) Charlie, who shorted his restricted, voting only status stock TWICE, was at one time AZNT's control person. What happened to his 144 subscription papers when he left AZNT? Did he destroy them? Who do you think would be fed that info you old crow? Who would call up the NASD with it? You? Pauly? How can an auditor audit something destroyed? Give us a clue you old bat? While you're at it, maybe you can define rule 6530 for us &let us know where AZNT isn't compliant? Why was the new rule created AFTER the NASD can't come up themselves where AZNT is not compliant? The SEC has no problem with the 10k, why does the guy you flooded with calls? You're a piece of sht Shell. I have noidea how a btch like you can sleep at night, but screw ya, AZNT will prevail. The auditor will re-do the 'questionable' (??) parts then shove it up your as. Do us a favor and dive head first into the nearest crapper, will ya? Pugs By: JaniceShell Reply To: 6610 by Pugs Monday, 4 Oct 1999 at 4:40 PM EDT Post # of 6621 And Pugs: here's what the auditor actually had to say. Please explain to me what the hell it has to do with Charlie Kricfalusi: We did not observe the physical inventory in 1998 stated in the accompanying financial statements at $444,983. The Company's records do not permit the application of other auditing procedures inventories. In addition, the Company does not maintain certain customary accounting records and supporting documents relating to transactions with suppliers and customers, nor, in our opinion, is the system of internal control adequate to provide safeguards of assets and to assure proper recording of transactions. Accordingly, it was impracticable to extend our procedures sufficiently to determine the extent to which the financial statements may have been affected by these conditions. Since inventory at December 31, 1998 enters significantly into the determination of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, and since the Company does not maintain certain customary accounting records or documents, or an adequate system of internal control, as described in the preceding paragraph, the scope of our work was not sufficient to enable us to express an opinion, and we do not express an opinion on the financial statements referred to above. You are a moron, Pugs. You STILL don't Get It, do you?