SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Q. who wrote (4335)10/4/1999 11:49:00 AM
From: Mighty_Mezz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7056
 
re:Is he recommending his stock in a news release by making a prediction of a positive return on investment?
Many past press releases have contained hopeful, hypeful phrases like that. They are cited as allegations of attempted upward manipulation in the class action complaint.

re: did not get millions in an IPO,
If HITT had tried an IPO, they would have had to put out a prospectus full of disclosures, and nobody would have subscribed. ROFL!

Watching the MMs, I see the ask ticked up with the news, but not the bid. LOL

...Mezz -



To: Q. who wrote (4335)10/4/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 7056
 
In this sentence, has Dorian Reed crossed a line that he should not cross? Is he recommending his stock in a news release by making a prediction of a positive return on investment?

I'd say yes to both. Just IMO, naturally.



To: Q. who wrote (4335)10/4/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: wonk  Respond to of 7056
 
...Holy cow! You don't see this very often in a news release.

In this sentence, has Dorian Reed crossed a line that he should not cross? Is he recommending his stock in a news release by making a prediction of a positive return on investment?


Layman's discussion of the Safe Harbor Provisions:

...The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform Act") provides a new and important safe harbor for disclosures made by reporting companies. In an effort to encourage companies to disclose forward-looking information to investors, the Reform Act eliminates liability under the Securities Acts for certain written and oral forward-looking statements made by a company that is subject to the reporting requirements under Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the 1934 Act. Generally, the Reform Act sets forth a two-prong test, where, if either prong is satisfied, the reporting company is shielded from liability under the Securities Acts. Under the first prong, liability is precluded with respect to any forward-looking statement that either (i) is identified as forward-looking and is accompanied by "meaningful" cautionary statements which identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ "materially" from those in the forward-looking statement or (ii) is an immaterial statement. The second prong examines the state of mind of the person making the forward-looking statement rather than focusing on the forward-looking and cautionary statements. Under this prong, a company is protected from liability under the Securities Acts where a plaintiff fails to prove that the forward-looking statement (i) when made by an actual person, was made with actual knowledge by that person that the statement was false or misleading or (ii) when made by a "business entity," was made by or with the approval of an executive officer of that entity with actual knowledge by such officer that the statement was false or misleading. Although the Reform Act excepts certain parties and transactions from the new safe harbor protections, the forward-looking safe harbor is designed to enhance market efficiency by facilitating an increased flow of information to investors....

mmmlaw.com

ww

Credit to Jeff Mitchell for finding this well written primer.