Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (73820)	10/4/1999 1:29:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572915

Fudd, <..and spreading BS...> Yes, this would be the right name for it :) Let see: zdnet.com "Integrating the cache into the chip, otherwise known as on die, offers a performance increase, because the memory can operate at the full clock speed of the chip. The performance increase offered by this is usually about 10 percent, according to Intel." According to who? Usually? How about the Celeron performance "boost"? What a joke... More: "Intel says the 600MHz Coppermine Pentium III, when combined with its forthcoming 820 chip set, perform between 12 and 20 percent faster than the current 600MHz Pentium III chips on performance benchmarks." Says who? :) Combined with what? i820? hehe.. And the "performance benchmarks".. what the heck are those? Are they somehow different from "application benchmarks" or from simply "benchmarks"? hehe again...