SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (73847)10/4/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572330
 
Re: "Jim - RE: "and per my sources (and Anand) yields very well." And Paul was saying a 184mm2 chip would be likely to have low yields."

You missed the point. Maybe it does yield well, for a 184mm2 chip, but that's poor compared to a smaller one. Good is still bad.

EP



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (73847)10/4/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: DRBES  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572330
 
RE: "And Paul was saying a 184mm2 chip would be likely to have low yields."

Indeed...but at intEL and not AMD.

Regards,

DARBES



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (73847)10/4/1999 4:35:00 PM
From: Burt Masnick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572330
 
"Yields very well" at AMD could be below the minimal acceptable at Intel.



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (73847)10/5/1999 1:13:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1572330
 
Cringe - Re: "And Paul was saying a 184mm2 chip would be likely to have low yields"

Better believe Paul.

Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News