SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (57066)10/4/1999 9:21:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Not quite so puzzling, is it? Reagan said things that some people REALLY liked and some people REALLY didn't like. He elicited a love-or-hate reaction more than most. I would say Reagan believed things that some people liked, and some people didn't, but I am concerned that you don't think he really believed what he said. We can, at least, agree that he said what he said. So when analyzing Reagan, the first hurdle is determining whether one's reaction is colored by one's reaction to the message, not just the messenger.

Take me, for example. Reagan said things that I wanted to hear, regardless of who said them. So I liked the message. And, I had no reason to distrust the messenger. I think if I'd been a resident of California, I might have felt differently about it, but I wasn't. So, my visceral reaction to Reagan is positive, rather than negative. I admit that when he was first elected, I thought he would be a bad president. After he became president, I thought he was a good one. That's probably colored by my political beliefs, which, no doubt, diverge widely from yours.

These men can't be judged by the same standards that we judge our husbands or our sons or our neighbors. My husband is a far better person, but he couldn't lead a country.



To: E who wrote (57066)10/4/1999 9:59:00 PM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Multiple personality disorder, IMO. Comes from acting in too many B movies as the star's best friend.



To: E who wrote (57066)10/5/1999 11:47:00 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Or perhaps he was smart enough to see that the people perceived as bright -- Harold Stassen, Rockefeller, that guy who ran for president as a democrat four or five times in the 50s and 60s as an intellectual and got tronced every time -- weren't appreciated while those who emphasized their positive, feel good attributes and were perceived as people you could sit down with on the front porch and talk to -- Truman, Eisenhower -- were elected.