Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kolo55 who wrote (15002)	10/4/1999 7:04:00 PM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

You are predictably mediocre. You covered your ass by saying "could be a buy," but you never advocated a buy. Even by your own contorted revisionism today you admit you did not buy it at $13. On the other hand, there is no equivocation in my post in August 1998. I said " One more thing, given the market risk right now, I think CKFR is going lower. If it does, I'll buy it again because, as you pointed out, it is a great (and very functional) service." I also revealed then that "I sold at 28 3/4." Why is it you never revealed you bought it at "8 and 9" later that year? Is it the same reason I never revealed I started buying back at 10 the whole way down to 6? If people care to check what you are writing - though I doubt they will - you will have nowhere to hide - though I suspect the loss of pride and dignity never stopped you before. It explains why you do this now. You have won on one point - I allowed myself to get pulled into a petty argument with someone who has no scruples.