Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MGV who wrote (15004)	10/4/1999 7:10:00 PM
From: kolo55	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

More to the point, Mark, is you lied about the record. Remember this post? (Second time, I have brought this to your attention.) I wrote it when I turned bullish on CKFR. "Wow, this stock looks cheap here." Message 5965494 So lets summarize. Today this was your first version of events: "CKFR: He criticized being long CKFR in August-Sept. of 1998 when it was priced at approx. $15, down from $25. Today it closed at 41 7/8." In truth, I was long CKFR from early on the posts on that thread, buying in the low teens and selling in the high 20s. You were long on the stock when it got pounded in August of 98. We exchanged posts on CKFR before that date. I got interested again after the stock got pounded. And I turned bullish in October, when the stock bottomed below 10. Your post today was a mis-leading lie about both your position, and my position. From the posts we've linked to today, anyone can see my record on calling CKFR was better than you. And it wasn't the only lie in your post today. Next, we need to see the posts on the FLEX-CLS pair trade I recommended. Paul