SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (73961)10/5/1999 2:11:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572630
 
Paul Re <<I think you are the ONLY FOOL that doesn't realize that Intel's stock ROSE $2 1/16 on the first trading day following the publication of the Bearon's article.>>

Barron's article was a negative on INTC. INTC dropped in after hours and was weak in the morning. the SOXX index was up almost 5% today!! That carried into INTC.

Granted however that Barrons article was a big yawn as far as I am concerned.

Mani



To: Paul Engel who wrote (73961)10/5/1999 3:00:00 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572630
 
RE <<<I think you are the ONLY FOOL that doesn't realize that Intel's stock ROSE $2 1/16 on the first trading day following the publication of the Bearon's article.>>>

Don't you be the FOOL. Today was 'the dead cat bounce'; the dead cat being intc.....it was too oversold not to go up. Soon enough, it will resume its downward trend.

Don't worry I will let you know when its about to happen....probably right after Barrett announces Q3 results.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News