SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (74083)10/5/1999 6:27:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572336
 
<Can you really call it vicious and predatory when Intel leaves enough margin in there to make around $2 Billion profit a quarter for themselves and their stockholders?>

Do you have more than one ounce brains like Prengel
has? How many times it is necessary to
repeat for you that Intel profits were not $2B
but ten times smaller (if any at all) when you
count money "fairly"? The loophole in accounting
is not an excuse. Got it now, or you need
some more explanations that money do not
appear or disappear out from the air?



To: Tony Viola who wrote (74083)10/6/1999 2:53:00 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572336
 
RE <<<Can you really call it vicious and predatory when Intel leaves enough margin in there to make around $2 Billion profit a quarter for themselves and their stockholders?>>>

Yes, because it was vicious and predatory against AMD,not intc. No one would call it vicious and predatory if intc did it to itself.

Not that intc escaped the consequences of its heavy discounting if US Bancorp is correct in its Q3 estimate of revenues.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News