Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (74107)	10/5/1999 8:17:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572378

<What can you possibly be talking about?> Sorry, I forgot that English lesson of FF. The phrase "Intel profits were not $2B but ten times smaller" should read: "Intel profits were not $2B but 1/10 of that" Is this more clear for you? :) :) :) <What do you think the Securities And Exchange Commission is for?> I think the SEC is for watching for compliance with formal and lawful accounting :) If Intel found a huge loophole in that accounting that creates an image of extremely successful company in eyes of dolts like yourself, it is not my problem. The scum scheme may continue to run for some time, but it will end. Once again, (until full victory): forbes.com forbes.com