SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Techride -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: faqsnlojiks who wrote (5039)10/5/1999 8:28:00 PM
From: Joana Tides  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7442
 
Joe, so now my kites are on the ground again, waiting for a breeze. Thinking xBNBNx is The Very Next Phrase comin' up, because it didn't move back down but a tad so i kept it. xCMCSKx has been sneakin' up there, & my new xZIPLx & xETELx are lookin' likely. xNZROx i dunno we'll see (spoiled, get worried if there's no plus next to the ticker inside 48 hours) xLCOSx went back up again towards the Close with 4X average volume, so might be buying that one back again as early as tomorrow. xYHOO'sx earnings are soon & if it Blows 'Em Away it might do this time what we'd hoped it'd do last time when it Blew 'Em Away but it didn't. That selloff around earnings is an old habit that dies hard on that one, so thought it best to KA-BLAST it & wait for Do It Again. xTx is looking good, up 1 3/8 today & still cheap along with xLUx up 2 1/4 today. Kept xISLDx thinking it's still got room to move up easy before it has to break on through, do you think? Had to follow My Rule with xRCNCx as it went up too much too fast following news to excuse holding onto it any longer when it reversed (a bird in the hand). Actually kept most of 'em along with The Sleeper of course. Still think xMSGIx is The Ringer, considered quacking a block of that one but couldn't bring myself to pull the trigger.
Thank YOU for the 909s,
More 909s Please,
Joanie
ps. powder's for putting eggs in one basket on whichever goes up the fastest & WHEN is the question, not IF.