Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jdaasoc who wrote (31632)	10/5/1999 8:44:00 PM
From: Don Green	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

> I am going out on limb and betting the CC820, the two RIMM/two SIMM, motherboard is coming out soon. What do you define as soon? Don

To: Jdaasoc who wrote (31632)	10/11/1999 4:02:00 PM
From: Doug M.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Jdaasoc or anyone, at the Intel Developer Forum Intel gave Camino transition guidelines. Intel said that the main focus for the transition was the 2 RIMM + 2 DIMM solution. They said a single board can take Rambus RIMMs or standard PC100 DIMMs. This sounds like the cc820 board doesn't it? With well over a month since the IDF when Intel was pushing the 2RIMM+2DIMM solution (with the MTH chip)I am at a slight loss as to what is really going on. From what I understand, the Camino problem only manifests itself in certain 3RIMM configurations under maximum stress tests. I guess the 3RIMM is the Vancouver board. I don't see why Intel can't bring out their "main focus" 2+2 solution soon. If Intel has problems with this too, then they really have their heads up their a@@. What was the idea of the 3RIMM solution to begin with when Intel was pushing the 2+2 to "manage the transition" to RDRAM? Any thoughts/comments, Doug