Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (74157)	10/5/1999 11:09:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572369

Re: "I believe that spec int was 37 and fp was 42 for AThlon Ultra 700 with 266Mhz DDR ram." Those are very impressive scores, no doubt about it. The future will be interesting... Re: "Also perhaps u have seen something on Cumine spec scores or are they hiding them again." Don't pay any attention to those rumors Kash. They're all BS. EP

To: kash johal who wrote (74157)	10/6/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572369

kash - <Also perhaps u have seen something on Cumine spec scores or are they hiding them again.> What's up with you? I've seen several posts like this just scanning. I don't believe it's a matter of hiding anything. Maybe just a matter of getting the news out? Intel presented in the afternoon. I don't know if the benchmarks are a part of the presentation today, or if Intel is waiting until launch to present this data, a normal Intel business practice. I do know that I can safely talk about the design enhancements of Coppermine as of now. I want to see a published story on the Coppermine presentation today worse than anybody, but I don't believe Intel is "hiding" anything, IMO. PB