SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (74226)10/6/1999 10:52:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572946
 
Cirrus - <fp would still be slower than Athlon, int is right in-line.>

Next opportunity to see some Cumine spec numbers is at product launch. I am figuring since i820 is either known to be or potentially delayed well before Cumine launch, that the folks in charge of such things will have other options handy so the numbers will be available one way or the other. Just my unwashed opinion.

PB



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (74226)10/6/1999 11:29:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572946
 
Re: ""Altogether memory-hungry applications profit from it substantially, to SPECfp95 become for example 20 per cent faster, SPECint95 by 12 per cent."

"IF" these numbers are correct, Intel's SpecInt95 numbers would be ~5% faster than Athlon's at 550MHz, and I would expect the gap to widen as MHz increases. Larger on-die L2 versions would show an even wider gap and scale even better.

EP


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News