Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kathyh who wrote (64361)	10/6/1999 1:04:00 PM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

Hey watch what you're implying about NY! :^)

To: kathyh who wrote (64361)	10/6/1999 1:05:00 PM
From: Selfmade$	Respond to of 90042

Kathy, Eagle, I totally agree with you guys "NY,NY number 2 and Rochester #3"!!!! does not make any sense, they mentioned it on CNBC twice today, I'm not sure where they got it from. Maye it was politically correct to choose NY over Austin ;)ggg OV

To: kathyh who wrote (64361)	10/6/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: Tx Buck	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

Off Topic: Austin Wife and I moved to this little mecca from snowy cold Ohio in '76. Last year population passed Seattle and Portland and Austin sadly has lost as much as it has gained over the years. Austin voters have turned away two pro baseball teams in the last three years and I'm not sure that a pro football team would fare much better right now. An interesting place to live. Buck