Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geoffreycs who wrote (8947)	10/6/1999 2:32:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 11603

Add the GRAMs...GeoGoof...31 Grams to the Ounce and that is 2 + 6 + 11 = 19 grams divude by 31 = .61 OPT OUNCE PER TON...granted non repeatable thus I concure non economic as yet. But I would in geology terms always say that any geo worth his salt, would say, "Chuckie; but first ya gots to find the gold." That was said to be by C.L. over 3 years ago. The rest just might be///I mean HISTORY! ChuckaButFirst-Geo also.

To: geoffreycs who wrote (8947)	10/6/1999 3:26:00 PM
From: Ptaskmaster	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11603

Thanks for posting "Anomalous does not equal economic" in response to "Jeepers, can't you read" instead of other less interesting replies such as "Sure, do you know how to spell?" It appears that surficial geology and metal extraction really are different from real estate promotion. When I subscribed to SI, I assumed that discussions on clearly demarcated Boards (Subjects) generally followed current threads (topics) of interest. Understanding the nature of the internet, Silicon Investor and anonymous posting, I assumed that words, numbers and the information and ideas they convey were of paramount importance. Messages written to enhance ease of reading and understanding save readers' time, and allow for the evaluation of the information and ideas conveyed. In my opinion posters who make no attempt to check their spelling and follow reasonable syntax within their abilities demonstrate contempt for their readers. Members, lurkers and new readers looking to transfer resources into PM and PGM related investments will see the resulting gibberish on a supposedly professional discussion group and scroll on by. My concern a few days ago was why Maxam's share price was declining. Now, I note that Maxam is currently at 0.093, down 7% since Monday (Oct 4th), and down 38% since Sept 29th. Ptask