Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (66907)	10/6/1999 3:08:00 PM
From: SeaViewer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

It's just amazing that this market could go up on big negative ticks. I am on the edge of throwing the towel.

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (66907)	10/6/1999 3:09:00 PM
From: Lucretius	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

note the inverse charts... the most speculative hard asset play... and the most speculative paper play.... timely.com timely.com GSR leads......

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (66907)	10/6/1999 3:18:00 PM
From: Defrocked	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86076

If you believe in contrary opinion then today was a heck of a setup. Bulls comfortable and adding, shorts stuffed again. But bonds couldn't hold highs and gold could. Friday's unemployment number could be complete negative since August nonfarm was only 124K. It could be revised upward and the 220k consensus may also fall short. The real kicker would be .4% avg hourly earnings. So far, the Sept.20/21 SPZ gap of 1338 to 1345 has not been breached. Yeah, so, you say?? Until then I reserved the right to be cautious, especially since hardly anyone else is now. BIDKJS.