SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (68731)10/6/1999 6:02:00 PM
From: BGR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Heinz,

So, Merton and Scholes believed that inefficiencies existed, tried to exploit that and failed miserably. That proves to you that the market is inefficient!? In the short run, indeed, going long or going short makes no difference in a perfectly efficient market as equities have the same probability to go up as down. However, I said long term, right? Long term, in an efficient market price is indicative of value, and if the economy grows in an inflation adjusted way (as it has always done historically, as productivity has increased) going long is expected to be more profitable than going short.

-BGR.



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (68731)10/6/1999 11:09:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
BGR believes in random walk, so SPY makes sense. I can't refute that, can you?