Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kathyh who wrote (64446)	10/6/1999 11:41:00 PM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

kathy, Looks like our turtle is heading the wrong way. I wonder if he has a Y2K problem. I probably should have posted to you when I noticed the stock reversing its trend in the 30's but I hope you arent mad at me. I did sell over 1/2 my shares but will look for a re-entry when its time. This might be temporary. If IMCL has the science and its going well then things should be okay and recover. I cant possibly believe Merck of Europe would have done their DD then funded IMCL as well as building them a plant if they didnt believe things were kosher here. I'm sure their attorneys researched the patents too. Crossing my fingers for IMCL and us.... Jane

To: kathyh who wrote (64446)	10/6/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: cirrus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

Hi Kathy! Good to hear from you! Hope all is well. I skimmed the s3. Patent disputes are fairly common, and I am mystified that a potential dispute should have such an adverse affect. Makes me wonder what I missed, or are the institutions overreacting? I'm in from 25 for the long term, but seeing a stock fall 30% in two days makes one think: Where there's smoke... If the secondary offering is cancelled or postponed it will be an indication of real trouble, IMHO.