SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Simba who wrote (68759)10/8/1999 12:12:00 PM
From: BGR  Respond to of 132070
 
Simba,

As I have mentioned, it was in my play account (one in which I take inordinate risks and can afford 100% losses). In my real account, my returns have been just matching that of the market, so Mr. Buffet evidently has done better than me. He is a superb investor, the kind that makes the strong form of EMH untrue. However, my question is, is his investment philosophy universally applicable? IOW, can he write a set of principles that can be codified and applied by a black box which will duplicate his performance? I think the answer is no. Otherwise, there wouldn't be so many Buffet devotees humbled by the market.

As an analogy, I play tennis and Rafter plays tennis. I play percentage tennis, which doesn't mean that Rafter should as well. But if I try to play tennis like Rafter, my ranking will clearly drop and not improve. Similarly, if I try to do value investing ala Buffet ... you get the picture; so, thanks, but I choose high percentage index fund investing.

Last, but not least, my average cost basis for my index funds (which I have been buying for 6, almost 7 years now) puts the average PE in the low teens (since I DCA, the PE doesn't increase linearly). I am a buy-and-hold investor too, in fact I plan to buy regularly and hold till I retire. Am I a value investor, then? Or is it OK for Buffet to hold Coke at PE of 40, but not OK for me to hold S&P at PE of 35, because he is doing it actively and I am doing it passively? <VBG>

-BGR.