Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (57614)	10/7/1999 1:30:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Imo there is a big difference between telling someone he has his facts amiss and calling him a moron. From where I lounge, E did the first - and in my book that is no insult. It is a call to debate. The second is a debate stopper, y'know?

To: Neocon who wrote (57614)	10/7/1999 2:05:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

The subject of the disagreement here is Ronald Reagan, the personal admiration of whom I consider an ominous portent and disgrace to the nation. I have argued my conviction entirely within the bounds of the the normal rules of engagement, even in heated argument, I believe. If you believe mine is, per se, a position that shouldn't have been uttered, say so. Otherwise, would you show me, please, some instances in which you feel I have overstepped the bounds of decency, and insulted Zoltan and others in a personal, ad hominem, fashion that was a justifying provocation for Zoltan's personal insults? I would appreciate it, so that I may apologize.