SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (11616)10/7/1999 3:05:00 PM
From: Thor Carlsen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14226
 
Zeev, would you know how and what this could mean for producing a check?
<<<
approximately 75 pounds of dried precipitate and intends to
recover the precious metals
>>>

Thor



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (11616)10/7/1999 3:47:00 PM
From: Scott Wheeler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14226
 
Zeev, I'm not without concern. But I think it should be noted that the TA must be least as much affected by their disgust with what they perceive of as "crying 'wolf'" as any insider activities. If your TA is good enough to explain the sinking bid, then it should also be good enough to explain the volume in the past 2-3 weeks. I have yet to hear a plausible explanation other than the reflexive (and question-begging) "distribution" answer. Somebody is buying. Who? Why? What are they thinking? Are they stupid or crazy? Have they swallowed lies? Happy talk?
I can't say I understand the pattern, either, but I can only guess that it's a bimodal distribution (two populations), one very optimistic and one pessimistic. Beyond this I'm not smart enough to know...regards, Scott



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (11616)10/7/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14226
 
Zeev, <<strongly worded news release>> Remember, it's just a little plant. Probably a tent, paring knife for the onion, and a plastic bag to keep the cook from crying. <VBG>



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (11616)10/7/1999 5:06:00 PM
From: Robert J Mullenbach  Respond to of 14226
 
< I would say it is a case of "when the TA and FA ...">

that was the first thing that came to mind, you must have made an

impression.

Gambling Bob,