Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (42403)	10/8/1999 8:09:00 AM
From: Enigma	Respond to of 116770

Re: Barrick - I've been unable to log-in for the last couple of weeks - so have been in the position of reading the messages - but not able to respond. I just posted this on the Barrick (edit) Thread: To: Serge Collins who wrote (1362) From: DoubleD Friday, Oct 8 1999 7:47AM ET Reply # of 1364 Serge, Robert Kalb, etc., etc., ad nauseum - it's about time someone challenged all this bilge and crap that is being posted about Barrick and its hedging programme. I don't know if ABX has made a NR about it yet - up to yesterday it hadn't - probably operating under the premise 'let the ignorant flounder, and let the wise realise that Barrick is the best placed of all the major producers' - and that the pullback in the stock is mainly because so many people are too lazy to differentiate between the good and the bad in this gold mining game. nuf said? dd It's quite extraordinary how the most successful of all the major producers attracts so much (ignorant) bile "Peter Munkey" for example. And being able to read and not respond had been interesting, and frustrating in other ways - Henry V's brief sojourn was interesting too and the responses from O'49er - not answered I think? But Henry is always sanguine and wise. Interesting times and more to come. dd