Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (42408)	10/7/1999 7:17:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116897

Richard, do you remember this note: #reply-11008884 Worked like a charm, didn't it?

To: long-gone who wrote (42408)	10/7/1999 7:25:00 PM
From: Ken Benes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116897

Richard: That is most unfortunate. I believe HM and NEM fit into the category you described. In the case of NEM, they were leaned on to provide gold to an overly short market in order to keep the scheme going. It would appear to me that some of the bullion banks are open to a degree of liability in promoting the forward selling to levels not prudent. If GATA can link this too excessive profit by some influential companies and people the current turn of events have a long way to go before there is a resolution. The mining companies are tantamount to the widow being forced to buy speculative stocks by an unscrupulous broker. With the legal sharks out for high profit suits, some of them may shift from representing the widows to representing the producers. Ken