Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michel lavail who wrote (7834)	10/8/1999 8:16:00 AM
From: Mephistopheles	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

"In April of that year, Starnet had issued these shares, which are separate from the 10 million vend-in shares issue to Murray Partners BVI, an offshore account owned indirectly by some of Starnet's officers and directors and their families, according to regulatory filings." What a clean and clear organization... for the shareholders! (some of them).

To: michel lavail who wrote (7834)	10/8/1999 10:43:00 AM
From: Amit Ghate	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

I love the choice of words "dump" and "dumped" rather than "sell" or "sold". Very fitting coming from the ex-chairman. LOL Amit >Mr. White claims that in reality, his shares were not restricted in any way, and he should have been able to dump them at his sole and unrestricted discretion. The suit does not mention if the former Starnet chairman shorted the stock as a hedge to lock in his windfall profits. The suit claims that because of Levesque's mistaken advice, he was unable to sell his shares immediately. Mr. White claims he did not sell any of these shares until Aug. 20 to 25, much later than he would have otherwise done, had he been correctly advised. The suit does not note if White dumped all his shares in this period, or if he faced a margin call after the stock price suddenly collapsed.<